<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NBC&#8217;s Horrible Trauma Still Has Horrible Ratings &#8211; Now Stable Enough for Transport to Oblivion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sfcitizen.com/blog/2009/10/20/nbcs-horrible-trauma-still-has-horrible-ratings-now-stable-enough-for-transport-to-oblivion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sfcitizen.com/blog/2009/10/20/nbcs-horrible-trauma-still-has-horrible-ratings-now-stable-enough-for-transport-to-oblivion/</link>
	<description>editor@sfcitizen.com Six Turning and Four Burning</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:19:07 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jen</title>
		<link>http://sfcitizen.com/blog/2009/10/20/nbcs-horrible-trauma-still-has-horrible-ratings-now-stable-enough-for-transport-to-oblivion/#comment-11851</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 22:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sfcitizen.com/blog/?p=11386#comment-11851</guid>
		<description>:D Your post cracked me up!  I had no idea that the medical professional world found Trauma so....offensive!  It does beg the question, who the hell makes up the &quot;1.8 level&quot; watching this crap?  

I&#039;m just waiting for Trauma to get the ax in hopes that it means NBC brings Chuck back early and orders a full season of nerdy goodness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://sfcitizen.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  Your post cracked me up!  I had no idea that the medical professional world found Trauma so&#8230;.offensive!  It does beg the question, who the hell makes up the &#8220;1.8 level&#8221; watching this crap?  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m just waiting for Trauma to get the ax in hopes that it means NBC brings Chuck back early and orders a full season of nerdy goodness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Professor Z</title>
		<link>http://sfcitizen.com/blog/2009/10/20/nbcs-horrible-trauma-still-has-horrible-ratings-now-stable-enough-for-transport-to-oblivion/#comment-11850</link>
		<dc:creator>Professor Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sfcitizen.com/blog/?p=11386#comment-11850</guid>
		<description>The only thing this show has going for it is the San Francisco scenery. Why the decision to exclude compelling characters, story arcs, or central conflicts? This show didn&#039;t have to follow the ER model or the House model, but it should try to adhere to some basic storytelling model. 

I vote for bringing back the Zodiac killer in a three-story arc that offs every character not called Rabbit, then rebooting the show with at least a few C-list actors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only thing this show has going for it is the San Francisco scenery. Why the decision to exclude compelling characters, story arcs, or central conflicts? This show didn&#8217;t have to follow the ER model or the House model, but it should try to adhere to some basic storytelling model. </p>
<p>I vote for bringing back the Zodiac killer in a three-story arc that offs every character not called Rabbit, then rebooting the show with at least a few C-list actors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whole Wheat Toast</title>
		<link>http://sfcitizen.com/blog/2009/10/20/nbcs-horrible-trauma-still-has-horrible-ratings-now-stable-enough-for-transport-to-oblivion/#comment-11849</link>
		<dc:creator>Whole Wheat Toast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sfcitizen.com/blog/?p=11386#comment-11849</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m OK with Trauma, but I think it&#039;s best for them to cancel it. The writers need to stick to one problem, not a series of problems leading up to a problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m OK with Trauma, but I think it&#8217;s best for them to cancel it. The writers need to stick to one problem, not a series of problems leading up to a problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
