But I don’t think it would make a whole bunch of difference. Get up to speed on this issue here with Tim Redmond.
Here are the results of the non-scientific traffic survey, the number of vehicles making illegal rights onto the freeway during the morning drive from 8:00 AM to 9:00 AM:
2007: 17 per hour
2010: 0 per hour
Would I feel comfortable running this intersection on a bike parallel to a driver? Oh no. I would slow down to avoid any trouble. Just me. (Actually, I try to avoid the whole Wiggle / Octavia thing as there’s a better route, involving the intersection of McAllister and Divisadero, to take back and forth from downtown to the Panhandle anyway.)
IMO, cameras would be great. Why not? Put them in high crime areas as well, why not?
Now, the reason that commuters were making the illegal turns every day was because Octavia Boulevard doesn’t work nearly as well as the old Central Freeway. (Everybody says it wasn’t earthquake-safe but it was, it was retrofitted at great cost, only to be torn a little later.) Octavia Boulevard is like a half-assed Central Freeway that takes congestion off of the freeway and onto the streets. Anyway, due to that congestion at Market, the freeway onramp is always clear. People would have to get into the daily stop and go mess of Octavia in order to legally use the offramp so they would just use Market and make an illegal turn to jump the queue. Octavia sucks.
Oh well. City Bright Michael Yaki had the answer back in the day – it was called “Yaki’s Compromise.” But the landed gentry of Hayes Valley won out and now we’re left with the mess. Oh well. (MY is too polite to come out and say, “I told you so,” but, in fact, he told us so.)
Dear Michael Yaki – we were wrong and you were right.
Tags: 2010, bay area, bikes, bouelvard, california, camera, cars, compromise, drivers, illegal, leland yee, market, michael yaki, mike, octavia, right, San Francisco, traffic, turn, yaki, yaki's compromise