<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How is Changing Our Tax Rules Just for Twitter Not Corporate Welfare?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sfcitizen.com/blog/2011/02/10/how-is-changing-our-tax-rules-just-for-twitter-not-corporate-welfare/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sfcitizen.com/blog/2011/02/10/how-is-changing-our-tax-rules-just-for-twitter-not-corporate-welfare/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=how-is-changing-our-tax-rules-just-for-twitter-not-corporate-welfare</link>
	<description>&#34;If you want a vision of the future, imagine Larry Ellison eating a hot dog - forever&#34; editor@SFCitizen.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 04:55:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: reza</title>
		<link>http://sfcitizen.com/blog/2011/02/10/how-is-changing-our-tax-rules-just-for-twitter-not-corporate-welfare/#comment-70466</link>
		<dc:creator>reza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sfcitizen.com/blog/?p=27035#comment-70466</guid>
		<description>It does seem like corporate welfare, however, the area is somewhat blighted and to large degree ignored.  Lets contemplate the potential upside - the area gets improved, employees of Twitter populate the area during the day, spending money at lunch and other times which supports many other smaller business&#039; in the area.  The area becomes a valid option for other companies seeking an address outside of the traditional business environments, etc.  Whereas it does appear like welfare, it might be best to view this as a total package.  Not in favor here or opposed, as don&#039;t know enough to make decision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does seem like corporate welfare, however, the area is somewhat blighted and to large degree ignored.  Lets contemplate the potential upside &#8211; the area gets improved, employees of Twitter populate the area during the day, spending money at lunch and other times which supports many other smaller business&#8217; in the area.  The area becomes a valid option for other companies seeking an address outside of the traditional business environments, etc.  Whereas it does appear like welfare, it might be best to view this as a total package.  Not in favor here or opposed, as don&#8217;t know enough to make decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herr Doktor Professor Deth Vegetable</title>
		<link>http://sfcitizen.com/blog/2011/02/10/how-is-changing-our-tax-rules-just-for-twitter-not-corporate-welfare/#comment-70273</link>
		<dc:creator>Herr Doktor Professor Deth Vegetable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 19:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sfcitizen.com/blog/?p=27035#comment-70273</guid>
		<description>This is totally Corporate Welfare, and I suggest you contact your Supe to protest, I have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is totally Corporate Welfare, and I suggest you contact your Supe to protest, I have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
