Oh, that’s right, Twitter, you never promised not to be evil, so go ahead, choose evil. And as a matter of fact, why don’t you just tell us right now, you know, since, apparently, you feel you’re carrying the water for the entire 415, how much of our money you need? Why stop at $5, 10, 20, or 40 mil? What about $100,000,000 or even $1,000,000,000? You’ll get your eight figures of corporate welfare but you think deserve more, right?
Everybody’s laughing at you Twitter, everybody in Counties Mateo and Clara. Can you hear the laughter? “HA-HA,” they’re saying. Twitter can’t make it on its own, they’re saying.
So let’s free up the headline from “Twitter, Don’t Be Evil,” and substitute “Plagiarizing Steven T. Jones.” Thusly:
“Yet Mirkarimi and others also say integrity has already been lacking from a process he called “sleazy,” with properties being added willy-nilly to the tax-exclusion zone by a private power broker with an apparent conflict of interest; no fiscal analysis given to the Muni line, police foot patrols, and other perks promised to Twitter; and little thought given to the bad precedent this sets for other businesses (a point given real resonance today when Bay Citizen reported that Zynga is also threatening to leave the city if it doesn’t get a deal similar to Twitter’s).”
Well, that just about covers the bases, huh? Moving on…
What’s the point of having intelligent women in local government if the process of how they got there makes them so beholden to the process that got them there? Oh well.
Now Nevius, you can’t blame Chris Daly for everything for ever, right? That train has left the station. But you are correct about the shakedown issue – why can’t each and every Supe go to some taxpaying entity and say, “Do a little community outreach in my district and for every dollar your spend, I’ll lower your taxes by $10,” huh? Oh, and what about Zygna and all the others – you forgot about them, right? And do you think Mark Farrell or somebody would agree to buy a house or a car first and only then negotiate the terms? What good is there in electing “fiscal conservatives” if they don’t treat the Wealth of the People, of the Commons, as if it were their own? Mmmm. And what about all the failed programs in the area that have already been tried – aren’t they worth a mention? And is the Mid-Market Corporate Welfare Zone really an example of “market failure,” really? Isn’t it an example of government failure instead? And while you’re pondering that, why don’t we just buy out your buddy Randy Shaw right now? Just take the $80,000,000 all for yourself, RS, and leave town and never come back. (Two things San Francisco would have been better off without are Redevelopment and Randy Shaw, Inc., oh well. And the funny thing is that we paid small fortunes for both. Even if they had come for free we’d have been better off without them.)
And, oh, one more topic. Let’s go all the way back to 1880’s-style corporate welfare in San Francisco. That particular bit of improper favoritism got struck down by the United States Supreme Court. But who’ll save us from the mess?
And, oh, Lady Gaga came by, huh? Well, good for you, Twitter.
Good for you.
Tags: 2011, bay area, biz stone, california, corporate, corruption, Douglas Shorenstein, Jane Kim, mid market, randy shaw, San Francisco, San Francisco Corruption, sf mart, tax, taxes, twitter, Welfare, zygna