Archive for the ‘aircraft’ Category

Funston, Bitches: Area Aeronaut Couldn’t Be More Chill

Wednesday, November 29th, 2017

As seen from Fort Funston, GGNRA:

GO8F0940a-copy

FTDK: A Forked-Tailed Doctor Killer Above Frisco, 58 Years After The Day The Music Died

Tuesday, November 21st, 2017

That was the old name for this Beech Bonanza 35 seen flying over the 94117.

That was in reference to the type of flier it attracted, due to its appearance, its “ramp appeal.”

7J7C2662 copy

They don’t make them anymore, but newer versions of the FTDK include the Icon A5 and the Cirrus SR22.

Some feel

 

The Queen of the Skies Says Good-Bye to Frisco, America – No More Boeing 747 Flights from Domestic Carriers as of November 7th 2017

Tuesday, October 10th, 2017

Read all about it.

As seen from Lincoln Park…

7J7C1345 copy

7J7C1339 copy

7J7C1337 copy

And Lafayette:

7J7C9888 copy

7J7C9874 copy

7J7C9882 copy

7J7C9884 copy

You might still see some remaining fuel-hungry 747’s from a few foreign carriers, from the military, like Air Force One, and there will be cargo flights for a good long time, but passenger service has pretty much died out in 2017.

United Airlines’s SFO hub has been the last holdout…

Double Seven: Yesterday’s Blue Angels Show had Twin #7 Jets Performing – Photos from the Toll Plaza Area

Saturday, October 7th, 2017

Being atop an old gun battery just west of the Golden Gate Bridge Toll Plaza isn’t the best place to see the Fleet Week airshow, and it’s not exactly easy to get to, owing to jammed traffic, but it’s where I ended up. Here are some photos from Friday practice day.

7J7C1429 copy

Two of things are not like the others/ Two of these thing just don’t belong. Can you see?

7J7C9759 copy

That’s right, there are two two-seaters in there. Like this:

7J7C9761 copy

And this. There’s no flying required back there, so why not just put your arms out.

7J7C1419 copy

Most are single-seaters:

7J7C9789 copy

Oh look, two #7’s

7J7C9760a copy

See?

7J7C9764 copy

See?

7J7C1409 copy

I’m thinking Aquatic Park or the Marina Green would be better places to be.

7J7C1383 copy

All right, c u later:

7J7C1382 copy

Don’t Try Flying Under Our Golden Gate Bridge with an Airplane, But with a Chopper, Well BE MY GUEST

Monday, October 2nd, 2017

Because, apparently, all the reasons why airplanes aren’t allowed to horse around with the GGB have ZERO APPLICATION to helicopters. See?

7J7C0853 copy

Apparently…

For Some Reason, About 10% of the USAF’s Remaining KC-10 EXTENDER Aerial Refueling Tankers Flew Over the Golden Gate Bridge Yesterday

Monday, August 28th, 2017

One after the other.

Here’s one coming:

7J7C8453 copy

And another one over the Golden Gate, this one, #60031:

7J7C8455 copy

And another one leaving, passing over the Presidio, last seen heading east:

7J7C8463 copy

I saw five myself.

The KC-10 has worked out all right considering the record of its civilian counterparts in the DC-10 / MD-11 family.

The Air Force considered retiring its fleet of KC-10 tankers in response to sequestration budget cuts as part of the service’s FY 2015 budget. A “vertical chop” to divest all KC-10s was suggested because there are fewer KC-10s than KC-135s, having three different tanker models in service (after the introduction of the KC-46) would be costly, and a “horizontal cut” across the refueling fleets would achieve small efficiencies.[20] Some believed retiring the KC-10 would not benefit the Air Force, given that it is equipped with both boom and hose-and-drogue refueling systems and the fleet’s relatively young age.[21] At first, officials claimed that the initial focus on retiring the KC-10 in September 2013 was a “trial balloon” to call attention to Air Force operating cost issues; as of early 2013, the KC-10 had a per hour flying cost of $21,170 and a mission capable rate of 87 percent.[22] A FY 2015 budget plan did not include cuts to the KC-10.[23]

Anyway, I’ve never seen anything like this.

The Drone Bros of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area (GGNRA)

Tuesday, August 15th, 2017

Agin the rules this is:

IMG_5151a copy

Sorry, Bros.

IMG_5156a copy

Still, mad props for the state of drones these days, able to hover in like 30 MPH gusts – I thought it could have been a hawk at first.

Choose wisely, else you might get cited

ONLY IN MARIN: Mailboxes, Etc.

Monday, July 24th, 2017

7J7C6971 copy

Hint: Radar.

Radar!

D-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d…
Don’t you know the men all pause
Yeah, just look at them
(Woof!)
The dog is coming out of them
A natural dog
Radar!
(Woof!)
Radar!

VIDEO: Helicopter flies UNDER the Golden Gate Bridge – (Don’t Try This in a Plane, or You Will Lose Your License)

Monday, July 17th, 2017

And, like I said before, I am surprised that this is allowed as a daily thing (weather permitting):

Surprising that Flying Under the Golden Gate Bridge is Allowed by the FAA, in This Day and Age

Tuesday, July 11th, 2017

This is how it goes, every day, weather permitting, under our Golden Gate Bridge:

7J7C6229 copy

7J7C6230 copy

7J7C5290 copy

You know, like this:

Or if there’s too much fog up high, I guess they’ll go under from west to east, thusly:

IMG_5938 copy

It’s hard to tell, but the pilot is staying in the clear and just under a lot of fog

7J7C5916 copy

And then off to wherever:

7J7C5918 copy

To repeat, it’s Surprising that Flying Under the Golden Gate Bridge is Allowed by the FAA, in This Day and Age.

You know, safety and whatnot.