Archive for the ‘Pedestrians’ Category

Chill Pedestrian: Today’s Tom Sawyer Rides a Hoverboard

Thursday, August 3rd, 2017

7J7C7125 copy

A modern day warrior
Mean, mean stride
Today’s Tom Sawyer
Mean, mean pride

Rec & Park Finally Shamed Into Repaving the Panhandle’s Southern Trail – Hundreds of Further Pedestrian/Jogger Injuries Averted

Friday, July 7th, 2017

This is the newly-paved pedestrian (meaning no bikes / skateboards allowed) path along Oak in the Golden Gate Park Panhandle (or as RPD now refers to it, Panhandle Park, but of course the Oklahoma Panhandle is still a part of Oklahoma, right?)

I’d see people, mostly joggers, falling down on this formerly bumpy path all the time, but RPD didn’t care ’cause it had/has some plan for “irrigation,” whatever that means.

Of course, they can always dig this up whenever they get to their irrigation issue, you know, in a decade or two.

Here it is, enjoy:

IMG_5904 copy

IMG_5903 copy

IMG_5898 copy

IMG_5897 copy

Abbey Road 2017, If Abbey Road were Filled with Frisco’s Distracted Pedestrians

Monday, April 3rd, 2017

Poor bike rider had to slow down and go around this gaggle, which crossed about 20 seconds early* (or 30 seconds late depending on how you look at it.)

This is fairly typical.

7J7C9553 copy

I am not an elected official and I don’t work for an agency headed by somebody who can be fired by an elected official, so my thinking is unaffected by ze politique.

So I won’t ever tell you, “Gosh darnit, I gotta believe that we’ll achieve Vision Zero 2024 under the leadership of [person who appointed me/person who could unemploy me in about five minutes].”

*So I’m saying they didn’t enter the intersection under a green or even a flashing red DON’T WALK**.

**Starting across when you see the DON’T WALK is still illegal behavior in Cali, but not in NYC, where DON’T WALK means SURE, GO AHEAD AND WALK these days due to a recent change…

This “Substandard” Pedestrian Bridge on Geary has a Bright Future in 2017, Despite All Its Haters at the SFCTA / SFMTA

Wednesday, February 8th, 2017

One doc the SFCTA had dissed this bridge 23 times, ’cause the SFCTA thinks it will interfere with the Geary BRT project. And this marketing doc here gets into it a bit.

Well it turns out that this bridge will stick around. Look, about a dozen and a half souls were using it last I saw it:

7J7C6671 (2) copy

Anyway, this bridge will slow down the BRT yet they’re still talking about how the “average” #38 round-trip rider will save a half an hour a day. This seems impossible to me. If they said a few #38 riders might save a half hour on some days, well, that’d be more honest, but you can’t expect too much from the SFCTA / SFMTA…

7J7C5123 copy

Jaywalker Rest Stop, Market Street, Twitterloin

Monday, November 28th, 2016

Bro jaywalks a bit, then is forced to stop by traffic, as seen, then starts jaywalking again – almost walked into the side of a car he did.

10th and Market:


Of course, nobody would design an intersection this way…

Sidewalk “Bulb Outs” Embolden Already Overconfident Pedestrians – “Vision Zero” vs. Risk Compensation

Tuesday, November 8th, 2016

This is typical:


The reply to the thoughtless, repeated use of the novel term “Vision Zero” is this.

Do we really want “comfortable,” confident pedestrians? Really?

Horrible Frisco Pedestrians – 13 Seconds Too Late, or 13 Seconds Too Early? – Zero Enforcement for These Jays

Friday, August 19th, 2016

7J7C0699 copy

Turns Out that SF’s Vision Zero 2024 Scheme is Actually Vision 50, and It’s Already Failed? Take a Look at This Official Doc

Thursday, June 30th, 2016

This document from 2013 is news to me:

Vision Statement: San Francisco is the most walkable city in North America. People choose to walk because our streets are lively and safe. Our actions to make walking more attractive will lead people to choose to walk for most short trips. This in turn will help create an efficient, effective transportation system and improve the health and well-being of our residents. San Francisco’s status as a great walking city will attract visitors and workers from all over the world to enjoy the vibrant street life and build the economy.

Goals: 1. Reduce serious and fatal pedestrian injuries by 25% by 2016 and by 50% by 2021 2. Reduce serious pedestrian injury inequities among neighborhoods 3. Increase walking and reduce short trips (< 1 mile) taken by car by 25% by 2021. 4. Provide high-quality walking environments

Well, I’ll tell you how this worked out – pedestrian deaths are UP, ever so slightly, since this time.

(Hey, does SFGov even count pedestrian deaths involving SFGov-operated streetcars and buses? IDK. In 2014 a pedestrian go hit by a bus on Geary near Baker, but his death didn’t make the SFPD’s annual report. And why wouldn’t SFGov count deaths on a state freeway or “state highway?”)

I’ve WALKed SF more than anyone at City Hall and the WALK SF org for that matter. I’m not optimistic about Vision 75 2016 or Vision 50 2019 or Vision 0 2024 or anything else cooked up by the marketing wizards of SFGov…

The First Block of Masonic is Far Too Hilly Curvy Speedy for Pedestrians to Jaywalk Upon – And Yet – Shopping at Trader Joe’s #100

Tuesday, April 5th, 2016

Due to the parking situation at this Trader Joe’s, people jaywalk here all the time. Sometimes they die.

7J7C2855 copy

Speaking of which, if small parking lots are so great, why not get rid of parking altogether at all the TJ’ses?

One wonders.

A Typical San Francisco Pedestrian – This is the Problem – VisionZero “Enhancements” Will Have No Effect Upon This

Friday, March 11th, 2016


7J7C2159 copy