Ford Motor Company of Dearborn, MI Defines “Living Wages” in SF, CA as Being Just 15% Above the Minimum – $16.13 Per Hour??

August 16th, 2017

And on top of that, Ford Motor Company (NYSEFS&P 100 ComponentS&P 500 Component) is “proud” to pay just $16.13 per hour.

See?

Capturefgdfff

And I’ll do the math for you, Gentle Reader, and I’ll show my “work,” heh:

Capturesdddsdddd

I think Ford could afFORD to pay about $10 an hour more to each one of its near minimum wage GoBike bike rental workers, especially in high-rent cities such as San Francisco (especially considering all the advertising they’re getting, especially considering how much they jacked up prices from the little-used, low-profile, tax and fee-payer-funded Bay Area Bike Share.)

Alternatively, FoMoCo could stop repeatedly claiming that it’s paying “living wages,” right?

What’s that, FORD is just like Citi in New York, a mere sponsor? Well, not really, as FORD tracks you, the GoBike user, more than Citibank does.  I mean, does Citi track how fast you drive your car the day after you install an app to use a bikeshare rental bike in NYC? IDTS. Like, why would it care? But does FORD?

look closer.

lc

Ah, mem’ries:

The Real Reason Behind Ford’s Move Into Bike-Sharing – Why would an auto giant want to start an urban bike-sharing business? Here’s a hint: It’s not about the bikes.

“Listen, here’s the deal. The opportunity is not bikes. That’s not why Ford’s in it. The opportunity is data, and the data is super valuable because it tells us these invisible paths that people are taking in this complex city in terms of how they want to get around.”

Oh what’s that, there’s no GPS on the bikes?

But what about your phone, is there GPS and whatnot on that?

There sure is. So that’s how they track your:

“Driving Characteristics, such as speed, use of accelerator, brakes, steering, seat belts, and other similar information about how the vehicle is used.”

And that’s not all…

FIN

Bad News for Amazon Whole Foods: “Court rules that ‘corrective education’ scheme is extortion – Herrera wins on two key issues in case”

August 15th, 2017

(So IDK. I thought that this exact kind of “corrective education” was “offered” to alleged shoplifters at the Whole Foodses of San Francisco, but I don’t know that this Corrective Education Company was the one involved.)

Anyway, I saw this scene at one of my rare visits to the Haight Street WF…

P1160623-copy

…and then posted this and this.

And now here comes this, just released:

“Court rules that ‘corrective education’ scheme is extortion – ‘This is textbook extortion,’ court finds. Herrera wins on two key issues in case.

SAN FRANCISCO (Aug. 15, 2017) — City Attorney Dennis Herrera today hailed a key victory against Corrective Education Company after a court ruled that the private, profit-driven business was engaging in extortion and false imprisonment in its “diversion program” scheme.

“We should all be concerned about privatizing our justice system, especially when a business like Corrective Education Company uses the threat of criminal prosecution to intimidate and extort people,” Herrera said. “This ruling goes to the heart of their predatory business model, which is predicated on threats, deception and falsehoods. CEC is enriching itself on the backs of others, and many of the people they prey upon have limited means and are just barely getting by.”

Herrera sued the company in November 2015 over its “corrective education” scheme, asserting that the company’s practices amount to extortion and false imprisonment. The lawsuit was filed in San Francisco Superior Court on behalf of the People of the State of California.

Corrective Education Company contracts with major retailers, and when someone is suspected of shoplifting, they are taken to an isolated room and threatened with arrest and criminal prosecution unless they agree to watch a video created by CEC. In that video, CEC threatens to have suspects criminally prosecuted unless they sign a confession, agree to pay CEC up to $500, and undergo a six-hour “cognitive restructuring” and “behavioral modification” program. Faced with this Hobson’s “choice” between criminal prosecution and participating in CEC’s program, 90 percent of CEC’s victims — upwards of 13,000 Californians — “consent” to enroll in CEC’s program. After obtaining the forced confessions, CEC follows up with phone calls to the victims, again threatening them with criminal prosecution unless they pay CEC hundreds of dollars. CEC has also sent over 2,000 debt-collection letters in which it cloaks itself with prosecutorial authority in further efforts to enrich itself.

CEC operates in more than 25 states across the country.

In a ruling issued Monday afternoon, San Francisco Superior Court Judge Harold Kahn found Corrective Education Company engaged in extortion and false imprisonment.

“The undisputed facts … establish that CEC’s diversion program runs afoul of California’s extortion laws,” Judge Kahn wrote in his ruling granting summary adjudication on the two central issues in the case. “This is textbook extortion under California law, and has been so declared for at least 125 years.”

Numerous jurisdictions in California, including San Francisco and Los Angeles, offer legitimate, pretrial diversion programs that are overseen by district attorney’s offices. CEC operates entirely outside of the criminal justice system and without the approval of local prosecutors.

In his ruling, Kahn ruled that each iteration of CEC’s diversion program in California constitutes extortion and false imprisonment and that Herrera was entitled to an injunction halting the unlawful practices. CEC’s clients have included Walmart, Bloomingdale’s, Ralph’s, Abercrombie and Fitch, Burlington Coat Factory, and Kroger’s.

In the ruling, Kahn wrote: “By the quid pro quo of asking for money in exchange for forbearance in calling police, the retailer and CEC are acting in concert and are jointly liable for the extortionate conduct.”

The specifics of the injunction are still to be fleshed out, as is restitution and monetary civil penalties of up to $2,500 per violation.

The case is: People of the State of California v. Corrective Education Company, San Francisco Superior Court Case No. CGC-15-549094 filed Nov. 23, 2015.

Frisco’s “Complaint-Driven” Anti-RV Parking Ordinance isn’t Working, So Far – Here’s the Proof

August 15th, 2017

Or, IDK, maybe it IS working, but all I know is that you still see a lot of RV’s parked on Fell during the hours of the new ban.

7J7C7642 copy

I’m sure if you call and call, then maybe somebody will do something, FBOW.

Anyway, maybe there are fewer RV’s parked on certain streets these days, but all I hear from people is that the Anti-RV Parking Ordinance isn’t Working, in the sense that lots of RVs are still around at places and times where and when they aren’t allowed – just an update here…

The Drone Bros of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area (GGNRA)

August 15th, 2017

Agin the rules this is:

IMG_5151a copy

Sorry, Bros.

IMG_5156a copy

Still, mad props for the state of drones these days, able to hover in like 30 MPH gusts – I thought it could have been a hawk at first.

Choose wisely, else you might get cited

The Sad Scene at the Fell Street DMV, with People Waiting in Line at Six-Something AM – What Do They Know?

August 15th, 2017

This was at about 6:20 AM:

7J7C7659 copy

What compels people to start queuing up two hours afore a joint opens? Is this a winning strategy?

Word On The Street: Poor Elon Musk! – “KATSU – SF AUG. 19 – A.I. CRIMINALS”

August 15th, 2017

7J7C7720 copy

[UPDATE: Indeed, it doesn’t look very pro-Elon. And Nitasha Tiku has the story.]

Ford Motor Company is Going All Out in Frisco: CITY OF TOMORROW SYMPOSIUM on August 17th at Fort Mason

August 14th, 2017

The tickets are free, but they are sold out, oh well.

dsddddddd

CONFERENCE
City of Tomorrow Symposium
Festival Pavilion
Aug 17th @ 8:00 a.m.
Ford Motor Company presents the “City of Tomorrow Symposium,” a gathering of distinguished speakers reflecting on the future of cities and urban mobility at Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture. The symposium covers topics such as self-driving cars, delivery innovations, sharing safe and smart streets, mass transit and commuting, future energy demands, and the evolving mobility landscape.

I’m sure the “City of Tomorrow” will be filled with Cars of Tomorrow. Yay!

05 Ford Gyron 1961

The Absurdity of Having New, Super-Wide Onramps Connecting To the Still-Narrow Panhandle Path

August 14th, 2017

Here it is, your overwhelmed Golden Gate Park Panhandle Path along Fell betwixt Stanyan and Baker:

7J7C7638 copy

It used to be narrower. I remember. Anyway, now it’s twelve feet wide. Inadequate, non?

Compare that width with the much wider, low-volume connector paths that take people to the Panhandle Path. (Yeah, this driver was confused. Sometimes people drive through here, to get across the Panhandle, but I think this was an attempt at parallel parking, possibly Outside Lands-related. The sidewalks/crosswalks are so wide that some people can’t tell that they’re crosswalks. But anyway…)

7J7C7630 copy

So, why not widen the Panhandle Path to a nice round 16 feet?

Teaching Little Ones the Importance of Proper Bicycle Lockage on the Mean Streets of San Francisco

August 14th, 2017

This is how some adults lock their rides:

img_6272-copy

Compare that with how this tyke locked his old-school Strider – you’d need to use hand tools to walk away with this bike:

7J7C7624 copy

ADVANTAGE: Area Toddler.

Flowery Graffiti: San Francisco Chronicle News Rack – “To OUST?”

August 14th, 2017

Some fonts I just can’t read:

7J7C7622 copy