I mean, there are at least 59 guests all the time just waiting to pick up their chow, right?
Click to expand
I cry foul.
The Bay Area is running out of airport so a big study is going on to try to see what to do.
Maybe some of our smaller airfields could pick up some of the load, or maybe the military could pitch in, somehow.
Anyway, they’re holding public meetings soon so why don’t you get in on the fun?
Monday, May 10, 2010, 7 pm – 9 pm
Municipal Services Center
33 Arroyo Drive, South San Francisco
Tuesday, May 11, 2010, 7 pm – 9 pm
First Floor, Multipurpose Room
675 Texas Street, Fairfield
Wednesday, May 12, 2010, 7 pm – 9 pm
Port of Oakland Exhibit Room
530 Water Street, Oakland
Are a lot more bigger airplanes in our future? How many 1000-passsenger Airbus A380-1000’s (or more realistically, 900-passenger A380-900’s) will we need?
A watery welcome for a big boy A380-800 (called El Gordo by pilotos) at SFO not too long ago:
At least there’s room for a horseshoe bar in a superjumbo. As seen over the Farallones:
If we can’t have more better runways at sometimes-foggy SFO, then look forward to ever bigger aircraft, for better or worse…
All right, see you there at those meetings.
All the deets, after the jump.
And here’s a comment from knowledgeable ActionNewsSF. (7500 Followers Can’t Be Wrong.)
“Interesting topic. After reading this article, I spoke with an “aviation expert”. We both agreed that either Buchanan Field in Concord or the Livermore Airport makes the best sense. We were surprised that the Livermore Airport is not on this map. The challenges for both of these locations would be selling to the residents who live near the airports.
Livermore is a great location due to its proximity to Modesto, Stockton, and Sacramento. An upgrade to Highway 84 and Vasco Road could makes this a very attractive site.
Concord is a good location because it is on a BART line and close to Solano County, Stockton and Sacramento.
Moffett is too close to SFO and SJC.
Byron is too far for 580 and upgrading an airport there means we have to build more freeways and extend BART to the middle of nowhere.
Napa would mean major upgrades to Highways 29, 12, and 37. This airport would really only be able to serve Napa, Solano and possibly Sonoma Counties. There really is no major transit line that serves this area. You know what that means? 30 years after it’s built, we’ll have to spend billions extending BART across the Carquinez Strait and through Vallejo.
Travis AFB in Fairfield is a possibility, but really too far from the Greater Bay Area. Once again, this means major upgrades to an already congested I-80.
Hopefully existing infrastructure and having to deal with the restrictions of nearby residents, something San Jose has to deal with, will be considered. I also hope that any future project will not waste our money, as the MTC did recently by renaming the Translink card.”