Posts Tagged ‘Comcast’
Wednesday, April 17th, 2013
Well, I don’t know if the people at Google Fiber should feel ashamed, but check it:
SONY-BACKED ISP SHAMES GOOGLE FIBER, LAUNCHES 2GBPS SERVICE IN JAPAN
That’s like what, about a thousand times faster than your AT&T ADSL connection for less than what Google charges for Google Fiber?
You know why we don’t have this here? Because of politically-connected monopolies like Comcast.
JAPAN DON’T HAVE NO COMCAST, YOU DIG?
Of course, the Japanese pay waaaaaay too much for rice, on account of bad policies having to do with mom and pop farmers, but they’re doing lots better than us with the internet.
Obvs.
And did you know that there are people living out there west of San Francisco, all the way out there in the Outer Richmond and the Outset (the Outer Sunset) who can’t get cable internet or DSL at any price? Yes, in this day and age, in 2013, there are people in this so-called World Capital of Innovation who go online with a dial up modem because they have no choice.
Poor devils.
Poor, poor West Bay devils. (At least they have Ocean Beach.)
In closing, the Comcast monopoly ought to get shut down and Sony should start selling us internet for cheap.
Tags: 2013, adsl, at&t, bay area, california, Comcast, dial up, district, dsl, fiber, ftth, google, google fiber, internet, japan, Japanese, Learning From Japan, moden, monopolies, monopoly, outer, outset, richmond, San Francisco, service, Sony, sunset, West Bay
Posted in consumer rights | 1 Comment »
Thursday, March 21st, 2013
Add this one to the list of crimes from DAVID KAY JEWELERS:
“You won’t get jealous when your friend gets the newer smaller version”

Click to expand
(Oh, and BTW, the offensive ad here isn’t “anti-gay” not at all.
To say so is ignorant.
But it is anti other things, I’ll grant you that.)
In closing, diamonds are horrible. Get anything else but a diamond. People will figure this out soon enough and the worthless piece of rock on your finger will be even more worthless a couple decades from now.
And more importantly, it will be seen by others as worthless.
Oh well.
Tags: 1872 union, 1st amendment, 2010, 2012, 2013, ad, ad muni, ads, advertisement, advertising, afghani, Afghanistan, bay area, board, bus, c w nevius, california, campaign, chief, Comcast, da', David Chiu, David Clay, David Clay Jewelers, District Attorney, east, Egotist, Gay, George Gascón, gsay, islam, Islamophobic, Jane Kim, jewelers, jewelrt, jihad, john avalos, KNTV, Lesbian, LGBT, lgct, London Breed, Malia Cohen, Mayor, mid-east, middle, Muni, my jihad, myjihad, national, nbc, Norman Yee, police, president, press conference, print, ring, rings, San Francisco, Scott Wiener, sfmnta, SFPD, show, side, spokesperson, Stephanie Ong Stillman, Stephanie Stillman, street, Supervisor, terrorism, terrosit, throwing rocks at pretty girls, today, Today show, TV, union, worst ad, Yemen, yemeni
Posted in advertising | 1 Comment »
Monday, March 18th, 2013
Ah, let’s see here, is District Attorney George Gascon going to be on the Today Show like today?
“SF District Attorney George Gascon will be on the Today show Monday am re: Islamophobic Ads on MUNI. Stay tuned!… http://fb.me/10hSSRRFR ”
Could be (but I’ll never know ’cause I only have a rabbit ear antenna and, oddly, there’s no NBC affiliate in my tiny town, nor in the county, nor in any of the neighboring counties and I’ll be damned if the Comcast monopoly is going to get $100 per month out of me for basic cable.)
Anyway, leave us review, let’s travel all the way back to ought-ten:
SF Police Chief George Gascon’s HATE CRIME act against Yemenis
OPINION: SFPD Chief’s apology did not address culturally insensitive mentality
So now in 2013, George Gascon sees a chance to make amends with all sorts of different groups by being the point man on SFGov’s anti-MUNI bus ad campaign?
Sure looks that way. See the press release below.
Hey, is George Gascon running for Mayor of San Francisco, you know, down the road?
Maybe. (All he needs to do is clear up his case of foot-in-mouth disease by 2017 or whatever.)
Fin.
New topic.
Are new ads coming to MUNI buses?
Check it:

Is this ad Islamophobic and is the City Family going hold another news conference? I don’t know. You tell me.
What I do know is that maybe the MyJihad campaign isn’t going so hot.
Oh, and the next big terrorism incident we’re going to run into will be due to a white American dude, most likely, just saying, GC. I’m srsly.
On It Goes…
“District Attorney, Board President Chiu, and City Leaders Denounce Islamophobic MUNI Ads
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
March 11, 2013
Contact: Stephanie Ong Stillman, DA Gascón’s Office
ADA Alex Bastian, DA Gascón’s Office
SAN FRANCISO – Today, District Attorney George Gascón, Board of Supervisors President David Chiu, and Supervisors John Avalos, London Breed, Malia Cohen, Jane Kim, Scott Wiener, Norman Yee held a press conference to denounce Islamophobic and racist advertisements by the American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI) scheduled to run on MUNI buses today.
“These offensive ads serve no other purpose than to denigrate our city’s Arab and Muslim communities,” said District Attorney George Gascón. “When any community in San Francisco is attacked, it affects all of us. I and the city leaders standing with me today are exercising our free speech rights in condemning these ads and standing with the Arab and Muslim communities of San Francisco.”
“Hate has no place in our City,” said Mayor Ed Lee. “San Francisco is a city that celebrates its diversity, and hateful speech and discrimination against our Arab and Muslim communities will never be tolerated.”
“Our respect for free speech does not mean we allow hateful speech to go unchallenged,” said Board President David Chiu. “As a former civil rights attorney, I’m proud to stand with our Arab and Muslim American families to send a united message that San Francisco embraces diversity and tolerance, not hate and bigotry.”
AFDI’s founder Pamela Geller has been deemed an anti-Muslim hate extremist by the Southern Poverty Law Center. In August of 2012, San Franciscans were outraged over AFDI advertisements on MUNI that referred to Arabs and Muslims as “savages.” Arab and Muslim community leaders say the new advertisements are even more offensive as they wrongly suggest that all Muslims are defined by extremism and violence, and baselessly target Arab and Muslim San Franciscans who make invaluable contributions to the city’s life and culture.
Supervisor David Chiu is introducing a resolution to condemn the Islamophobic and racist MUNI Ads at Tuesday’s Board of Supervisors meeting. In response, the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Authority will dedicate the proceeds from the offensive advertisements to fund a city-wide study on the impact of discrimination on Arab and Muslim communities. City leaders have met with Council on American-Islamic Relations – San Francisco Bay Area, Asian Law Caucus, the Ramallah Club, the Arab Cultural Center, churches and mosques to discuss targeting of vulnerable communities and the city’s commitment to protecting and standing with those communities.”
Tags: 1st amendment, 2010, ad, ads, advertisement, afghani, Afghanistan, board, bus, c w nevius, chief, Comcast, da', David Chiu, District Attorney, east, Gay, George Gascón, gsay, islam, Islamophobic, Jane Kim, jihad, john avalos, KNTV, Lesbian, LGBT, lgct, London Breed, Malia Cohen, Mayor, mid-east, middle, Muni, my jihad, myjihad, national, nbc, Norman Yee, police, president, press conference, Scott Wiener, sfmnta, SFPD, show, spokesperson, Stephanie Ong Stillman, Stephanie Stillman, Supervisor, terrorism, terrosit, today, Today show, TV, Yemen, yemeni
Posted in advertising, religion | No Comments »
Friday, November 2nd, 2012
It’ll look just like this.
It’ll cost you like $21-something for your ticket. Buy it now if you’re planning on going.
All the deets, below.

In closing, Fall Chocolate Salon, Fall Chocolate Salon, Fall Chocolate Salon!
“TasteTV and the International Chocolate Salon are pleased to announce that the 3rd Annual Fall Chocolate Salon is scheduled for Nov. 11th.
FALL CHOCOLATE SALON 11/11
Chocolate lovers, en garde! A unique event with limited tickets available for attendees, the Fall Luxury CHOCOLATE SALON participants include over 25 chocolatiers, confectioners, wineries and other culinary artisans.
An intimate setting, the Fall Chocolate Salon is the perfect place to find the perfect Holiday gift, while tasting and savoring the chocolate lovers experience.
Advance Tickets available through November 10th, while quantities last. (No Tickets at Door. San Francisco)
Celebrating its anniversary, the 2012 Third Annual Fall Luxury CHOCOLATE SALON participants include chocolatiers, confectioners, and other culinary artisans, such as Amano Artisan Chocolate, The TeaRoom Chocolate Company, Saratoga Chocolates, Toffee Talk, Smitten: Artisan Truffles, La Chatelaine Chocolat Co., Toffeeology, Jade Chocolates, Feve Artisan Chocolatier, Socola Chocolatier, Sixth Course Artisan Confections, Clarine’s Florentines, Plumeria Flours, Butterfly Brittle, CocoTutti, Marti Chocolatt, Snake & Butterfly, Quail Point Chocolates, Rachel Dunn Chocolates, Kallari Chocolate, Be A Gourmet, Farm Fresh To You, Gems and Silver Jewelry, The Winery SF, Jerk’NPickle, TasteTV,and more.
FallChocolateSalon.com
Tags: 122° West Winery, 20, 2010 Chocolatier Awards, 2012 spring, 4th, 6ht annual, AF2 Chocolatiers, Alter Eco Fair Trade Chocolate, Amano Artisan Chocolate, Amella Caramels, annual, awards, Barlovento Chocolates, bars, Beaux Gateaux, Beth Spotswood, bikini, Blue Angel Vodka, CacaoAtlanta, California Cookie Cutter Collectors Club, California Naturals, Carolyn Tillie Designs (Just Desserts Jewelry), Choclatique, chocolate, chocolate salon, Chocolate Television, Christopher Michael Chocolates, CJ's Bitz, Clarine's Florentines, Coco Delice Fine Chocolates, Coco-luxe Confections, Comcast, Cuisine Noir Magazine, Divine Chocolate, Divine Organics by Transition Nutrition, Dolce Bella Chocolates, Drexelius Chocolates, Edible Love Chocolates, EXCELLENCE, fall, Farm Fresh to You, Fentimans Botanically Brewed Beverages and Ginger Beer, fort mason, fourth, Gateau et Ganache, Ghirardelli Chocolate Company, Guittard Chocolate Company, Happy Chocolates, Her Coconess Confections, Herbst Pavillion, Jade Chocolates, Kikas Treats, kofy, Land of Chocolate, Le Creuset, Little Sky Lavender, Loft Organic Liqueurs, Malie Kai Chocolates, march 20th, Marin French Cheese Company, Marti Chocolatt, Maui Visitors Bureau, Napa Valley Fudge Company, Neo Cocoa, new york times, Nicobella vegan organic truffles, Ococoa, Omnivore Books on Food, Plush Puffs Gourmet Marshmallows, Poco Dolce, Posh Chocolat, Punk Dog Wines, Putumayo World Music, Quady Winery, Radee Wine, Resveratrol WINETIME Bar, Rigolo Cafe, Robyn's Chocolates & Confections, Sacred Chocolate, samples, San Francisco, San Francisco International Chocolate Salon, San Francisco Orchid Society, San Francisco Professional Food Society, Saratoga Chocolates, Saturday, Schoggi Swiss Chocolates, sf weekly, Snake & Butterfly, Socola Chocolatier, Sonoma Valley Portworks, Sterling Confections, Swissmar, TasteTV, TASTY AWARDS, TCHO, The Bread Project, The New York Times, The San Francisco Chocolate Factory, The Tea Room chocolate, The Winery Collective, tickets, Tofanelli Family Wines, truffle, Truffles in Paradise, TV, Van Gogh Dutch Chocolate Vodka and Chocolate Liqueur, Vermeer Dutch Chocolate Cream Liqueur, Vice Chocolates, William Dean Chocolates, winter, XOX Truffles, Zinc Details
Posted in food and drink | No Comments »
Thursday, March 1st, 2012
Once again, it’s the massive TasteTV San Francisco International Chocolate Salon at Festival Pavilion up at Fort Mason this Sunday.
“THE 6th ANNUAL
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL CHOCOLATE SALON
Sunday March 4, 2012
10:00am – 6:00pm
San Francisco, Fort Mason Center
Herbst Pavilion, 30,000 square feet of Chocolate, Wine and Confections”
Get your tickets here.
(This one is a bit more expensive and upscale compared with the outdoor Ghirardelli Square Chocolate Festival.)
There will be tons of people at the Salon, but the lines for samples won’t be too long at all.

Here it is from the inside:

Stirling Confections’ truffle bars:

It’s so totally worth it.
See you there March 4th!
Tags: 122° West Winery, 20, 2010 Chocolatier Awards, 2012 spring, 4th, 6ht annual, AF2 Chocolatiers, Alter Eco Fair Trade Chocolate, Amano Artisan Chocolate, Amella Caramels, annual, awards, Barlovento Chocolates, bars, Beaux Gateaux, Beth Spotswood, bikini, Blue Angel Vodka, CacaoAtlanta, California Cookie Cutter Collectors Club, California Naturals, Carolyn Tillie Designs (Just Desserts Jewelry), Choclatique, chocolate, chocolate salon, Chocolate Television, Christopher Michael Chocolates, CJ's Bitz, Clarine's Florentines, Coco Delice Fine Chocolates, Coco-luxe Confections, Comcast, Cuisine Noir Magazine, Divine Chocolate, Divine Organics by Transition Nutrition, Dolce Bella Chocolates, Drexelius Chocolates, Edible Love Chocolates, EXCELLENCE, Farm Fresh to You, Fentimans Botanically Brewed Beverages and Ginger Beer, fort mason, fourth, Gateau et Ganache, Ghirardelli Chocolate Company, Guittard Chocolate Company, Happy Chocolates, Her Coconess Confections, Herbst Pavillion, Jade Chocolates, Kikas Treats, kofy, Land of Chocolate, Le Creuset, Little Sky Lavender, Loft Organic Liqueurs, Malie Kai Chocolates, march 20th, Marin French Cheese Company, Marti Chocolatt, Maui Visitors Bureau, Napa Valley Fudge Company, Neo Cocoa, new york times, Nicobella vegan organic truffles, Ococoa, Omnivore Books on Food, Plush Puffs Gourmet Marshmallows, Poco Dolce, Posh Chocolat, Punk Dog Wines, Putumayo World Music, Quady Winery, Radee Wine, Resveratrol WINETIME Bar, Rigolo Cafe, Robyn's Chocolates & Confections, Sacred Chocolate, samples, San Francisco, San Francisco International Chocolate Salon, San Francisco Orchid Society, San Francisco Professional Food Society, Saratoga Chocolates, Saturday, Schoggi Swiss Chocolates, sf weekly, Snake & Butterfly, Socola Chocolatier, Sonoma Valley Portworks, Sterling Confections, Swissmar, TasteTV, TASTY AWARDS, TCHO, The Bread Project, The New York Times, The San Francisco Chocolate Factory, The Tea Room chocolate, The Winery Collective, tickets, Tofanelli Family Wines, truffle, Truffles in Paradise, TV, Van Gogh Dutch Chocolate Vodka and Chocolate Liqueur, Vermeer Dutch Chocolate Cream Liqueur, Vice Chocolates, William Dean Chocolates, winter, XOX Truffles, Zinc Details
Posted in food and drink | No Comments »
Tuesday, November 15th, 2011
The hard-core NIMBYs at San Francisco Beautiful (our Comcast monopoly’s L’il Buddy) ended up going two for two yesterday in their crusade ensure that dial-up internet service is the best that some San Franciscans can get. That is, they won a stay from Superior Court Judge Harold Khan temporarily blocking the installation of AT&T sidewalk boxes and they’ll have no requirement to post a bond to keep their stay.
This is, of course, despite the fact that the Board of Supervisors recently approved the installation.
Let’s hear the reaction from AT&T Regional Vice President, Marc Blakeman:
“Residents across the City, as well as the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, have voiced support for competition and choice when it comes to TV, high speed internet and digital phone service.
Despite today’s decision to issue a temporary stay, AT&T believes it ultimately will prevail in the litigation and it remains committed to bringing San Francisco a next generation IP network.”
Which, you know, sounds good to me, but I’m not a NIMBY.
So, when you see these existing boxes, which Judge Khan has no control over, what’s your reaction? Do you say, well there’s graffiti on a telephone box or an electricity box or a mail box so we shouldn’t have telephones and we shouldn’t have electricity and we shouldn’t have mail service? I don’t know.

Click to expand
Let’s hear from the NIMBY side of things after the jump, but I warn you, it’s barely legible.
On It Goes…
(more…)
Tags: 2011, 800 presidio, at&t, bay area, Blakeman, board, bond, Booker T. Washington, Booker T. Washington Community Service Center, box, boxes, cabinet, california, CEQA, color, Comcast, Community Service Center, court ruling, dpw, eir, eis, environmental impact, fiber, Harold, Harold Khan, internet, ip, Judge, khan, Marc, Marc Blakeman, monopoly, network, nimbies, nimby, nimbys, optic, phone, report, review, San Francisco, sidewalk, street, sunglint, Superior Court, supervisors, TV, u-verse, uverse, western addition, wireless
Posted in politics | 4 Comments »
Thursday, July 21st, 2011
Well, here it is, via Noe Valley SF, a Hyper-Local Guide to Noe Valley … With Attitude, it’s Supervisor Scott Wiener’s address to the NIMBY associations of District 8 regarding his approval of U-Verse Internet/TV/Phone service for San Francisco after all those years of delay.
See below – it goes on and on.
I myself don’t recall seeing too many AT&T boxes in the 415 with graffiti. The shots produced by the NIMBYs generally are from out of town / out of state. Anyway, here’s one of the genuine AT&T utility boxes already in town. It sort of has graffiti:

Via Eric Fischer – click to expand
Leave us begin:
From: Date: Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 4:41 PM
Subject: My vote on the AT&T issue
To: Scott.Wiener@sfgov.org
I’m sending this email to a number of neighborhood association leaders and other involved folks in District 8, in order to explain my vote yesterday on the AT&T environmental appeal. I would appreciate it if you would forward this email to your boards, memberships, and neighbors who have an interest in this issue. The voters are entitled to an explanation of all of my votes (and I cast many each week), including votes as controversial as this one. People can agree or disagree, but they deserve an explanation.
I will start by saying that I struggled mightily with this issue. Like many of you, I do not like these boxes, or any of the utility boxes that are already on our streets. Part of me very much wanted to vote against AT&T and for an EIR simply because I dislike the boxes. But one of the commitments that I made to myself, and to the voters, was that I’m not just going to be a reactive elected official. I committed that I was going to be the kind of elected official who tried to find solutions to hard issues. I also committed to myself early on that I would not abuse CEQA by ordering EIRs where the law doesn’t support it simply because I have policy issues with the underlying project. As described below, ordering an EIR here probably would have been illegal and certainly would have fed into our City and State’s addiction to environmental review, with the effect that good projects (including public projects) are delayed, killed, or made much more expensive than they need to be.
The issue here was very hard — pretty much everyone agrees that Comcast is in desperate need of competition while also agreeing that these boxes stink. There were also incredibly strong views on both sides of this issue. I received many emails from opponents, passionately and articulately describing the issues with the boxes, and from proponents, passionately and articulately describing why we need the service and competition. This was a no-win vote for me in terms of popularity contests. Either way I voted was going to make one group or the other upset with me. But, for better or for worse, casting controversial votes is what we do at the Board. If I wanted to be loved by everyone all the time, I wouldn’t have run for office.
And, this issue pointed to a major problem we have in San Francisco. We do a bad job managing our sidewalks. Our departments don’t coordinate well. We don’t have a strong master plan. We haven’t fully implemented the Better Streets Plan. That plan is how we should be managing our sidewalks and deciding what to put on them and where. Not through CEQA, which is a blunt instrument that doesn’t get you much other than delay and expense, but through actually having a plan for our sidewalks. As described below, through a strong and well-planned permitting system, we can do that.
So, why did I, in the end, tip in favor of voting to reject the appeal?”
It continues.
(more…)
Tags: 2011, 800 presidio, at&t, bay area, Blakeman, board, Booker T. Washington, Booker T. Washington Community Service Center, box, boxes, cabinet, california, CEQA, color, Comcast, Community Service Center, dpw, eir, eis, environmental impact, fiber, internet, ip, Marc, Marc Blakeman, network, nimbies, nimby, nimbys, optic, phone, report, review, San Francisco, Scott Wiener, sidewalk, street, sunglint, Supervisor, supervisors, TV, u-verse, uverse, western addition, wireless
Posted in technology | 1 Comment »
Wednesday, July 20th, 2011
[UPDATE: And oh, yesterday's vote at the Board o' Supes will have no effect upon cell phone service in San Francisco, despite what some might tell you. Uverse is about TV and wired Internet and wired phone service, for the most part. It's FttN, Fiber to the Node, bro-ham. It's not Fiber to the Cell Phone Antenna, no, not at all...]
The selfish, aging, rich, white, property-owning NIMBYs of San Francisco are having a tough go of it in the 415 during 2011. I mean, we just had the approval of the Booker T. Washington Community Service Center and the (effective) approval of the King Edward II project and, now, a whole mess of utility boxes from AT&T.
Am I saying that San Francisco should “push projects into neighborhoods without input?”
Yes, that’s exactly what I’m saying. The thing is though, even when you allow the NIMBY’s to give input before you start building a community service center or apartment building or brace of utility boxes, they’re still not happy.
Isn’t that funny?
Don’t you think that ugly people from San Francisco Beautiful had more than a little input on the long-delayed project to bring regular San Franciscans U-Verse Internet and TV and phone and WiFi service? (Way too much input, IMO.)
Anyway, Sunglint was all over yesterday’s action at the Board of Supervisors. See below. (Sunglint is not without strong feelings on the matter, so you’ve been warned.)
Is this an AT&T box? No it’s not. Should area NIMBY’s want it banned? Well, not if they want electricity:

Click to expand
Here’s an excerpt from Sunglint, who later goes into what was behind each pro-NIMBY vote:
“At approximately 4:45PST, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors voted to affirm the exemption determination for AT&T’s once-in-a-century telephone infrastructure upgrade project, aka “Project Lightspeed.” This means that AT&T can now start to implement their plan to upgrade the telecom infrastructure in the city, with the goal of delivering higher-speed 24Mbs DSL service within all San Francisco districts. AT&T also calls this as “Uverse” which can be any combination of television, telephone, and internet.
The final proposal seems to allow 495 cabinets to be installed throughout the city of San Francisco by AT&T. Multiple potential sites for each cabinet location are to be evaluated. When AT&T seeks an excavation permit from the DPW, besides doing the usual permit stuff, DPW will also notify that site’s supervisor. Then, that supervisor signs an MOU (memorandum of understanding) with AT&T regarding the site, or one of the alternative sightings are considered. Something like that: the specific details seem fuzzy. There seems to be a formal and sane DPW appeals process, and a my-supervisor-is-crazy-curve-ball appeals process.
Voting against were the following sorry lot of supervisors, with their comments below.
District 1: Eric Mar
District 3: David Chiu
District 5: Ross Mirkarimi
District 6: Jane Kim
District 11: John Avalos
Note to the supervisors listed above: I will be voting against you in future elections, geography permitting, and consider your conduct in this matter anti-internet, anti-technology, anti-jobs: death eaters, all! Here are specific comments.”
Get Sunglint’s summary of comments here.
All right, I have to go talk a suicidal Comcast executive down from the roof right now. He’s yelling, “Millions, millions, our precious monopoly is going to lose millions!”
Oh, and after the jump, a list of NIMBY fellow travelers, the people who don’t want you to have high-speed Internet and whatnot.
(more…)
Tags: 2011, 800 presidio, at&t, bay area, Blakeman, board, Booker T. Washington, Booker T. Washington Community Service Center, box, boxes, cabinet, california, CEQA, color, Comcast, Community Service Center, dpw, eir, eis, environmental impact, fiber, internet, ip, Marc, Marc Blakeman, network, nimbies, nimby, nimbys, optic, phone, report, review, San Francisco, sidewalk, street, sunglint, supervisors, TV, u-verse, uverse, western addition, wireless
Posted in technology | 2 Comments »
Tuesday, June 28th, 2011
[Well, the can got kicked down the road today at the BoS of course. Oh well. BTW, can your neighbors band together to prevent you from getting your mail? Not that I know of. So why should your neighbors band together to prevent you from getting your Internet at faster than dial-up speed? I don't know. Once again it's Rich White Homeowners 1, You 0.]
I don’t know, I think I’ve weighed-in enough already on the whole AT&T LightSpeed / U-Verse situation. But anyway, once more into the breach, my friends, once more down to City Hall for another Board of Supervisors meeting, starting at 2:00 PM this afternoon.
Now I know this might come as a shock to the easily shocked homeowners at San Francisco Beautiful, but, you know, most of the existing AT&T utility boxes in town don’t have graffiti all over them.
And remember, there’s graffiti in town that’s on other, non-AT&T utility structures.
Can you imagine?
All right, let me be your Sightsee M.C. – let’s take a tour of the Western Addition, the NIMBYs’ Fortress of Reaction.
Check it, is this a graffitoed AT&T box? No it’s not:

Click to expand
So what, should we take it out to satisfy the millionaire homeowners across the street? You know, just do without whatever utility this utility box provides? Is that what you want, NIMBYs?
I think that one above is about electricity.
I know this one here is about electricity or gas, one or the other or both – see the new SmartMeter stuff? Is this array considered blight? So then we should live in the dark with candles, maybe?

Oh here we go, look at all this telephone pole “blight.” Should we get rid of land lines now?

Now, I don’t think you people need to watch any more TV than you already do. But U-Verse is a utility, right? Just like phone service and electrical and gas and whatnot, right?
So what gives wealthy, influential, white people* the right to put the kibosh on somebody’s Internet / Phone / Cable TV triple play for $99** a month?
That’s what I don’t know…
*What’s that NIMBY? You’re not wealthy? Oh yes you are! What’s that NIMBY? You’re not influential? Oh yes you are! You’ve got Supervisor Scott Wiener shaking in his boots, as ascared of you as he is of area dog owners. What’s that NIMBY? You’re not white? Oh, forget it, you already know you’re white, right NIMBY?
**For the first six months, but then, look out, brother!
Tags: 2011, at&t, bay area, Blakeman, board, box, boxes, cabinet, california, CEQA, color, Comcast, dpw, eir, eis, environmental impact, fiber, internet, ip, Marc, Marc Blakeman, network, nimby, optic, phone, report, review, San Francisco, sidewalk, street, supervisors, TV, u-verse, uverse, wireless
Posted in paranormal | 6 Comments »
Tuesday, May 24th, 2011
Get up to speed on the U-Verse issue right here and Fog City Journal has coverage of yesterday’s rally at City Hall right here.
Oh, look, yet another “utility box” on the sidewalks of San Francisco. But, kell domaje, it’s covered in graffiti. Let’s solve this problem by cancelling mail service to the 415 – does that make sense?

Via Don BeetleDick
Now, let’s hear from the West Bay:
“My final words to SF Beautiful. Keep your hands off the neighborhoods of others. You don’t speak for us. We can speak for ourselves.”
Harsh. Now, I’m not sure how real a group the Ocean Beach Condominiums Homeowners Association is, but you can only get Comcast or dial-up internet out there near the ocean? Wow. Those poor devils, poor poor devils.
And, generally, do young people like judgmental homeowners associations? Apparently. (You mock twisted copper into the home? All right, but some people would like that. Deal with it. Who is stepping up for Fiber Into the Home or whatever they call it? Who is going to pay for that? Oh well, in the meantime, we’ll have AT&T as another choice.)
Anyway, appears as if those AT&T boxes will get approved today at the Board of Supes, but that will come with the chance that your neighbors will still say neigh and you won’t be able to get U-Verse after all.
Consider that a partial victory for Progress.
Tags: at&t, Blakeman, board, box, boxes, cabinet, CEQA, color, Comcast, dpw, eir, eis, environmental impact, fiber, internet, ip, Marc, Marc Blakeman, monopo;y, network, nimby, optic, phone, report, review, sf beautiful, sidewalk, street, supervisors, TV, u-verse, uverse, wireless
Posted in paranormal, politics, technology | No Comments »