Posts Tagged ‘graffiti’

Here’s All What’s Left of 1994’s Giant “Gold Mountain” Mural at Romolo Place in North Beach – Graffiti

Thursday, July 21st, 2016

First, the giant mural of Romolo was all like this:

2204913591_e5541c08c8_b

But now it’s all like this – I haven’t been through this way since it got painted over, thusly:

20160719_133430 copy

Due to this:

“I’m done with them. That’s why the mural is painted over,” Sherry said. She said that during the 2004 restoration, which took almost a year, she worked on the mural six days a week for almost a year and was only compensated for transportation and lunch. “It was an absolute nightmare,” she said. “All they could pay me was coming out of their poor little pockets, so I accepted it because at the time I could afford to take a lot of time to do this. … So I basically just did the work, and they let it go to hell again.

There was a theory that murals discourage graffiti. I don’t know well that theory worked out…

Does Marin Heart Bikes? “BIKE LAME”

Thursday, July 21st, 2016

On the road to Mt. Tamalpais:

9aab0b28116db76987f9aa24c0d82d9a copy

SF Loses Yet Another McDonalds, This Time at the Base of One of the Chevron Towers Near 2nd and Market – Whither Frisco’s McDonaldses?

Monday, July 11th, 2016

First at 441 Pine

7J7C1679-copy

And then at Golden Gate and Van Ness:

7J7C8410 copy

And now at Market Center:

7J7C8462 copy

When will the next domino fall?

Frisco Landscape: Range Rover, Shuttered McDonalds, Graffiti, Woman, Lexus, Another Lexus, Federal Building

Thursday, July 7th, 2016

And State Highway 101 to the left:

7J7C8410 copy

Chronicle Writer CWNevius IN FAVOR OF But Also AGAINST “Endangering Our Judiciary”

Tuesday, June 21st, 2016

So here’s CWNevius in June 2016, worried that the Stanford rape case might “endanger our judiciary” due to the loud complaints about the judge’s sentencing. Fine.

But here’s the very same CW Nevius, also in June 2016, telling people to “complain loudly” about the decisions of local judges. See?

Capturekjuhkiu copy

So what’s the deal? Is he trying to curry favor with our unpopular Mayor again while at the same time fulfilling an assignment to write something, anything, about a local story what’s gone national?

IDK, but it don’t add up.

Bad Dog? – “No, Bad Human” – Graffiti Artist Shames the Errant Dog Owners of the Western Addition’s “Alamo Square Historic District”

Friday, June 10th, 2016

I think leaving dog poo on the sidewalk is just as impermissible as tagging, but sometimes two wrongs make a right?

7J7C7264 copy

Anyway, somebody’s fed up with some of the dog owners of the Between Alamo Square And The Projects part of town…

Here’s What Happens When You Advertise on an SFMTA / MUNI Bus Stop Ad – Poor SHINOLA Detroit!

Monday, May 23rd, 2016

This kind of thing, as seen recently on the windswept Geary Transit Corridor…

7J7C6231 copy

…has precedents:

IMG_7003-copy

viewerds-copy
7J7C4774-copy

You know what I think? I think that sometimes companies pay money to Clear Channel Outdoor so that it will send part of that money to out sad-sack SFMTA and then maybe SFGov / the SFMTA will then look kindlier upon said generous companies. So it’s kind of more like a bribe / kickback / apology than a pure, earnest attempt at advertising.

I could cite examples…

Tree Graffiti, Golden Gate Park

Friday, April 1st, 2016

7J7C2950 copy

Maple Syzzurp Bear, Divisadero – DivCo Street Life North of Northeast of Panhandle (NoPA)

Wednesday, March 23rd, 2016

7J7C2444 copy

Popping bottles in the ice, like a blizzard
When we drink we do it right gettin slizzard
Sippin honey bear sizzurp in my ride, like Three 6
Now I’m feeling so fly like a G650

CWNEVIUS IS ALWAYS WRONG, 1 OF 1: “Clever Legal Maneuver” Against Penniless Tagger Cozy Terry has Cost Us $149K in Fees, So Far

Friday, March 18th, 2016

Here’s CWNevius in 2015:

San Francisco hitting up graffiti vandals with costly civil suits

“In an innovative and clever legal maneuver, the city attorney’s office is asking the courts to treat the city like any other property owner and allow it to sue for damages to pay for graffiti cleanup.”

And that process ended up with a six-figure judgment, mostly for attorney fees that we spent in order to get the six figure judgment:

The total bill — $217,831.64 — payable to San Francisco on Feb. 15, 2016.”

The problem with this that graffiti tagger Terry Cozy is never going to pay us back for all the attorney fees, obviously not before the now-passed February 2016 “deadline” but, equally obviously, not after either.

The amount of effort spent to collect on this uncollectable person is astounding. Check for yourself here. How about $149K in attorney fees, so far, as of January 2016, creating documents such as this:

Capturetyuttt

So this declaration proves up that the San Francisco Examiner had to pay $100-something to repair a graffiti’ed ‘Xam newsbox. Man, this looks like a lot of work, on a fruitless task. JMO.

Anyway, here’s where Nevius was wrong with his mindless cheerleading:

This kind of action isn’t “innovative” since it’s been done in the past. Let’s check back on the case of Carlos Rivera from a decade ago, back when SFGov was only half as big. It’s the exact same same approach – let’s sock it to these taggers with a huge judgment, that will show them! Or, in the words of Chuck: “Put that in your spray can.”

This kind of action isn’t necessarily “clever” since we’re spending a ton of money to run up the score on a defendant who’s never going to pay us back five figures, much less six figures. Does this make sense? $66,167.64 of PRINCIPAL but with $149,067.00 in ATTORNEY FEES?

END OF LINE

(more…)