Posts Tagged ‘pco’

Heartless DPT: Can You Put a Note on Your Car to Avoid an SFMTA MUNI DPT Parking Citation? Sometimes, But Not In This Case

Friday, September 15th, 2017

And I’ll tell you why.

7J7C9596 copy

It’s cause then everybody would do it and things would get out of hand. OTOH, if you are out there when they come around, trying to do a jump start or something, I think you’d have a better chance.

Just a note? I don’t think that’s going to cut it barring exceptional circumstances

7J7C1832-copy

(And this note above here, along with its mate at the rear, did work. Hurray.)

Double Parking, Frisco-Style – What Happens When Our Sidewalks are WAY Too Wide

Wednesday, July 5th, 2017

As seen dans le quartier interieur De Richmond:

IMG_5594 copy

You know, I don’t think I’ve ever called our SFMTA over bad parking – it would have to be a lot worse than this…

Parking Crisis Leads to a Fail, in Two Ways

Friday, June 23rd, 2017

First up is that you’re not supposed to leave your ride touching other cars. It just aint right.

7J7C4950 copy

And then on the other side, you can’t leave your bumper hanging over a crosswalk.

My Rx is a Scion IQ (out of production, due to lack of popularity) or a Smart car. Either would solve both probs…

THEORY: SFGov Responds to Problems Where It Can Make Money Faster Than Those Where It Can’t – Edleeville

Thursday, June 22nd, 2017

For example:

20170607_175825 copy

Help is on the way, sort of:

20170607_175822(1) copy

New-School “Neighborhood Electric Vehicle” (NEV) Parks Illegally on the Streets of San Francisco – Can You See What’s Wrong?

Monday, June 5th, 2017

Oh NEVs. I’ve seen this kind of thing afore with Smart Cars

7J7C3956 copy

Tsk tsk.

I know what you’re thinking driver, but:

CA Vehicle Code: 22502. (a) Except as otherwise provided in this chapter every vehicle stopped or parked upon a roadway where there are adjacent  curbs shall be stopped or parked with the right-hand wheels of such vehicle parallel with and within 18 inches of the right-hand curb…

Frisco’s New Tourist Parking Ban at Coit Tower is a Huge Success, or Failure, Your Choice! – Let’s Take a Look

Tuesday, May 9th, 2017

It took me a while to figure this one out:

7J7C1618 copy

So residents are allowed to park but tourists, or “visitors” euphemistically, well you can all go to Hell.

I can see how touristas should be limited to two hours or whatnot, but the top of Telegraph Hill is special, apparently.

Anyway, the real reason you can’t park there is that the locals don’t want you queuing up in a line of twenty cars, which was happening last year during construction time.

So guess what, the scary signs have scared away a good percentage of tourists, so the waiting time to park has gone way down, but the vast majority of the spaces are occupied by tourists anyway. Take a look – all these rides are owned by tourists:

7J7C1626 copy

But a handful of tidy German luxocars owned by local millionaires were on hand, see?

7J7C1636 copy

In theory, all the 20 or so rides up here should have these red stickers, but only three had them when I was there.

7J7C1627 copy

In other words, enforcement appears to be VisionZero or zero or whatever this year’s phrase for goose eggs is.

So there you have it. Is this sitch a success or not?

7J7C1630 copy

Scaring away half the tourists makes things easier for the remaining tourists and our local millionaire BMW and Audi owners too.

Of course, Frisco thinks all you tourists are deadbeats who should pay something like $5 or $10 just for the right to drive into town. (I’m srsly.) So you all are lucky to be able to drive up to Coit Tower without having to pass a toll booth.

Anyway, this program is a huge success or a small failure of democracy – it’s your choice.

(Now don’t go crazy and park up there overnight or anything.)

Visitor from New Yawk Scores 23(!) Parking Tickets in Less Than One Month

Thursday, April 27th, 2017

This won’t end well, it doesn’t look:

7J7C1101 copy

(Extraordinarily High Parking Ticket Prices Like Frisco’s Are Regressive – discuss amongst yourselves)

As seen in RPP Area Q, which was precisely devised to be most unfriendly to auslanders

Our SFMTA Doesn’t Want You to Park on the SIdewalk, Except When It Does

Wednesday, April 26th, 2017

Like this – this is SFMTA approved, as it’s time for weekly street cleaning:

7J7C0350 copy

Epic Front Plate License Plate Location

Monday, April 24th, 2017

I don’t know if this would get you out of a ticket with the SFMTA…

7J7C0984 copy

The Futility of Sending Out PCO’s to Ticket Cars a Full Half-Hour Before the Street Sweeper Arrives – Here’s What Happens

Thursday, April 6th, 2017

So SFMTA Parking Control Officers ticket cars for blocking a street cleaning truck during weekly street cleaning time, but then drivers come along later, see that the PCO’s are now long gone, and park. And then a half hour later, along comes the street sweeper, but of course it’s blocked by cars what have accumulated the past 30 minutes.

Thusly:

20170405_103820 copy

Of course, drivers are officially allowed to park on a block just after a street sweeper leaves, but this sitch above seems wrong. It makes things seem like street sweeping isn’t any big deal and it’s mostly about raising money for our SFMTA.

Solutions:

Send a second wave of PCO’s out just ahead of the street sweepers, like a few minutes. That would put an end to this weekly parking game right quick; or

Keep the PCO’s closer to the street sweeper in the first place. (This is the better choice.)

I fully understand why the SFMTA will take a program originally designed for some other purpose and change it into a way of raising money for the SFMTA, but when you allow the PCO’s to get so far away from the street sweepers you end up making a mockery of the program….