I don’t know, this one speaks for itself.
Be sure to add Norton Antivirus / Symantec‘s list o’ cities to your Meaningless List collection.
“High-tech hubs San Francisco and Raleigh are ranked fourth and fifth. San Francisco tops the list for riskiest online behavior and highest number of WiFi hotspots per capita. Many of these cities are considered some of the most tech-savvy cities in the nation, proving that even skilled and experienced Internet users are at risk when it comes to cybercrime and online insecurity.”
Maybe San Francisco wouldn’t need so many WiFi hotspots if we had like, you know, municipal WiFi ‘n stuff? (Weren’t we promised that about a half-deacde ago? Think so. Oh well.)
And who’s the winner? Detroit, of course. There it sits atop its empire of dirt, crowned:
“Of the 50 U.S. cities examined, Detroit came in as the least risky online city. Motor City’s residents were less likely to participate in risky online behavior compared to other cities in the study, and it also ranked low in cybercrime, access to the Internet, expenditures on computer equipment, and wireless Internet access. El Paso, Texas and Memphis, Tenn. came in second and third, respectively, on the list of least risky online cities.”
Anyway, check it out yourself. (Personally, I pity the MSM writer forced to make an article out of this uselessness.)
Presenting The Most Useless Press Release of 2010 (so far):
“Today the findings from Norton’s Top 10 Riskiest Online Cities Report were released, exposing the nation’s cities most vulnerable to cybercrime. To develop these rankings, Norton worked with Sperling’s BestPlaces to analyze factors for each city using a combination of Symantec Security Response’s data on cyberattacks and potential malware infections, as well as third-party data about online behavior, such as accessing Wi-Fi hotspots and online shopping.
“The following are ranked Norton’s Top 10 Riskiest Online Cities:
3.) Washington, D.C.
4.) San Francisco
5.) Raleigh, N.C.
9.) Austin, Texas
10.) Portland, Ore.
It goes on - more, lots more, after the jump